<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title> &#187; EPA</title>
	<atom:link href="http://agilisadvisory.com/blog/index.php/tag/epa/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://agilisadvisory.com/blog</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 May 2011 13:08:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>EPA takes responsibility for carbon&#8230; Congress pleased?  WSJ</title>
		<link>http://agilisadvisory.com/blog/index.php/2009/12/11/epa-takes-responsibility-for-carbon-congress-pleased-wsj/</link>
		<comments>http://agilisadvisory.com/blog/index.php/2009/12/11/epa-takes-responsibility-for-carbon-congress-pleased-wsj/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 13:12:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joe H</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CAA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agilisadvisory.com/blog/?p=3021</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kim Strassel: The EPA&#8217;s Carbon Bomb Fizzles &#8211; WSJ.com.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703514404574588120572016720.html?mod=rss_opinion_main" target="_blank">Kim Strassel: The EPA&#8217;s Carbon Bomb Fizzles &#8211; WSJ.com</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://agilisadvisory.com/blog/index.php/2009/12/11/epa-takes-responsibility-for-carbon-congress-pleased-wsj/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>EPA to move ethanol fuel blend requirements from 10 to 15% &#8212; NYT</title>
		<link>http://agilisadvisory.com/blog/index.php/2009/12/03/epa-to-move-ethanol-fuel-blend-requirements-from-10-to-15-nyt/</link>
		<comments>http://agilisadvisory.com/blog/index.php/2009/12/03/epa-to-move-ethanol-fuel-blend-requirements-from-10-to-15-nyt/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 13:08:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joe H</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biofuel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethanol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RFS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agilisadvisory.com/blog/?p=3006</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[E.P.A. Says It Expects to Raise Amount of Ethanol Allowed in Fuel Blends to 15% &#8211; NYTimes.com.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/02/business/energy-environment/02ethanol.html?partner=rss&amp;emc=rss" target="_blank">E.P.A. Says It Expects to Raise Amount of Ethanol Allowed in Fuel Blends to 15% &#8211; NYTimes.com</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://agilisadvisory.com/blog/index.php/2009/12/03/epa-to-move-ethanol-fuel-blend-requirements-from-10-to-15-nyt/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Correction to yesterday&#8217;s post&#8230; EPA postpones ethanol blend decision &#8212; NYT</title>
		<link>http://agilisadvisory.com/blog/index.php/2009/12/02/correction-to-yesterdays-post-epa-postpones-ethanol-blend-decision-nyt/</link>
		<comments>http://agilisadvisory.com/blog/index.php/2009/12/02/correction-to-yesterdays-post-epa-postpones-ethanol-blend-decision-nyt/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 13:00:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joe H</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biofuel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethanol]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agilisadvisory.com/blog/?p=2985</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[E.P.A. Postpones Ethanol Blend Decision &#8211; Green Inc. Blog &#8211; NYTimes.com.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://greeninc.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/12/01/epa-postpones-ethanol-blend-decision/" target="_blank">E.P.A. Postpones Ethanol Blend Decision &#8211; Green Inc. Blog &#8211; NYTimes.com</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://agilisadvisory.com/blog/index.php/2009/12/02/correction-to-yesterdays-post-epa-postpones-ethanol-blend-decision-nyt/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Utilities fear the impact &amp; cost of carbon regulation versus legislation &#8212; WSJ</title>
		<link>http://agilisadvisory.com/blog/index.php/2009/11/09/utilities-fear-the-impact-cost-of-carbon-regulation-versus-legislation-wsj/</link>
		<comments>http://agilisadvisory.com/blog/index.php/2009/11/09/utilities-fear-the-impact-cost-of-carbon-regulation-versus-legislation-wsj/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 14:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joe H</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cap & trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate bill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agilisadvisory.com/blog/?p=2742</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some Utilities Push Congress to Act on Carbon Emissions &#8211; WSJ.com.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125773125612937565.html" target="_blank">Some Utilities Push Congress to Act on Carbon Emissions &#8211; WSJ.com</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://agilisadvisory.com/blog/index.php/2009/11/09/utilities-fear-the-impact-cost-of-carbon-regulation-versus-legislation-wsj/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>EPA&#8217;s Jackson to step up enforcement of Clean Water Act &#8212; NYT</title>
		<link>http://agilisadvisory.com/blog/index.php/2009/10/16/epas-jackson-to-step-up-enforcement-of-clean-water-act-nyt/</link>
		<comments>http://agilisadvisory.com/blog/index.php/2009/10/16/epas-jackson-to-step-up-enforcement-of-clean-water-act-nyt/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 13:16:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joe H</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Water Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agilisadvisory.com/blog/?p=2536</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[E.P.A. Vows Better Enforcement of Water Act &#8211; NYTimes.com.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/16/business/energy-environment/16water.html?partner=rss&amp;emc=rss" target="_blank">E.P.A. Vows Better Enforcement of Water Act &#8211; NYTimes.com</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://agilisadvisory.com/blog/index.php/2009/10/16/epas-jackson-to-step-up-enforcement-of-clean-water-act-nyt/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The significance of Wednesday&#8217;s EPA carbon rules release &#8212; WSJ</title>
		<link>http://agilisadvisory.com/blog/index.php/2009/10/05/the-significance-of-wednesdays-epa-carbon-rules-release-wsj/</link>
		<comments>http://agilisadvisory.com/blog/index.php/2009/10/05/the-significance-of-wednesdays-epa-carbon-rules-release-wsj/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 12:23:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joe H</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kerry Boxer Bill]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agilisadvisory.com/blog/?p=2408</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[EPA Calls Carbon a Dangerous Pollutant &#8211; WSJ.com.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704471504574447090218534138.html?mod=rss_opinion_main" target="_blank">EPA Calls Carbon a Dangerous Pollutant &#8211; WSJ.com</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://agilisadvisory.com/blog/index.php/2009/10/05/the-significance-of-wednesdays-epa-carbon-rules-release-wsj/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>EPA not waiting for new Climate Legislation &#8212; pushing ahead with carbon regulation &#8212; NYT</title>
		<link>http://agilisadvisory.com/blog/index.php/2009/10/01/epa-not-waiting-for-new-climate-legislation-pushing-ahead-with-carbon-regulation-nyt/</link>
		<comments>http://agilisadvisory.com/blog/index.php/2009/10/01/epa-not-waiting-for-new-climate-legislation-pushing-ahead-with-carbon-regulation-nyt/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 13:59:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joe H</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate bill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Waxman Markey Bill]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agilisadvisory.com/blog/?p=2401</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[E.P.A. Moves to Curtail Greenhouse Gas Emissions &#8211; NYTimes.com.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/01/science/earth/01epa.html?ref=todayspaper" target="_blank">E.P.A. Moves to Curtail Greenhouse Gas Emissions &#8211; NYTimes.com</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://agilisadvisory.com/blog/index.php/2009/10/01/epa-not-waiting-for-new-climate-legislation-pushing-ahead-with-carbon-regulation-nyt/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>EPA now considering rules that will only apply to the largest emitters &#8212; NYT</title>
		<link>http://agilisadvisory.com/blog/index.php/2009/10/01/epa-now-considering-rules-that-will-only-apply-to-the-largest-emitters-nyt/</link>
		<comments>http://agilisadvisory.com/blog/index.php/2009/10/01/epa-now-considering-rules-that-will-only-apply-to-the-largest-emitters-nyt/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 13:53:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joe H</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agilisadvisory.com/blog/?p=2396</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[E.P.A. Rule Draws Fire From Large Emitters &#8211; Green Inc. Blog &#8211; NYTimes.com.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://greeninc.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/09/30/epa-rule-draws-fire-from-large-emitters/" target="_blank">E.P.A. Rule Draws Fire From Large Emitters &#8211; Green Inc. Blog &#8211; NYTimes.com</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://agilisadvisory.com/blog/index.php/2009/10/01/epa-now-considering-rules-that-will-only-apply-to-the-largest-emitters-nyt/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Backlash to Sen Murkowski&#8217;s EPA amendment&#8230; Dems prevent vote&#8230;. EPA back on track.</title>
		<link>http://agilisadvisory.com/blog/index.php/2009/09/25/backlash-to-sen-murkowskis-epa-amendment-dems-prevent-vote-epa-back-on-track/</link>
		<comments>http://agilisadvisory.com/blog/index.php/2009/09/25/backlash-to-sen-murkowskis-epa-amendment-dems-prevent-vote-epa-back-on-track/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 12:50:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joe H</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agilisadvisory.com/blog/?p=2321</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Less Awkward: Senators Backtrack on Plans to Rein in EPA &#8211; Environmental Capital &#8211; WSJ.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/environmentalcapital/2009/09/24/less-awkward-senators-backtrack-on-plans-to-rein-in-epa/" target="_blank"> Less Awkward: Senators Backtrack on Plans to Rein in EPA &#8211; Environmental Capital &#8211; WSJ</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://agilisadvisory.com/blog/index.php/2009/09/25/backlash-to-sen-murkowskis-epa-amendment-dems-prevent-vote-epa-back-on-track/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>**EPA RELEASES FINAL RULE WITH GHG REPORTING TO BEGIN IN 2010**</title>
		<link>http://agilisadvisory.com/blog/index.php/2009/09/23/epa-releases-final-rule-with-ghg-reporting-to-begin-in-2010/</link>
		<comments>http://agilisadvisory.com/blog/index.php/2009/09/23/epa-releases-final-rule-with-ghg-reporting-to-begin-in-2010/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 12:33:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joe H</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agilisadvisory.com/blog/?p=2265</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ClimateIntel.com » EPA to Begin Monitoring Largest Emitters in 2010.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://climateintel.com/2009/09/22/epa-to-begin-monitoring-largest-emitters-in-2010/" target="_blank">ClimateIntel.com » EPA to Begin Monitoring Largest Emitters in 2010</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://agilisadvisory.com/blog/index.php/2009/09/23/epa-releases-final-rule-with-ghg-reporting-to-begin-in-2010/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

